Roadway Includes Sidewalk: Involves the Interpretation of Sidewalk As Within Roadway Infrastructure | SFG Paralegal Services LLP
Helpful?
Yes No Share to Facebook

Roadway Includes Sidewalk:

Involves the Interpretation of Sidewalk As Within Roadway Infrastructure



Last Updated: August 22 2026

Question: In Ontario, does “roadway” under the Municipal Act, 2001 include a sidewalk?

Answer: In Ontario, “roadway” concepts under the Municipal Act, 2001 are interpreted broadly, and courts have held that municipal sidewalks are considered part of the highway/roadway infrastructure even if not intended for vehicle travel, including boulevards and ditches as part of the municipal roadway area, with decisions such as R. v. Nazark, 2024 ONCJ 76 and Cena v. Corporation of the Town of Oakville, 2009 CanLII 1650 reflecting that approach;   if you are dealing with a roadway-related notice, claim, or liability concern in Ontario, SFG Paralegal Services LLP can help you understand how the definition is likely applied and what practical next steps to take, call (888) 398-0121.

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources


Understanding That the Definition of Roadway Includes Sidewalk

When interpreting the term "roadway", it is crucial to consider the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, Chapter 25, as well as the pertinent case law.  Upon review of the case law, it is found that courts have defined "roadway" as including a sidewalk, a boulevard, a ditch, and other portions of the roadway infrastructure despite being unintended for the travel of automobiles.  This interpretation was stated within R. v. Nazark, 2024 ONCJ 76, and Cena v. Corporation of the Town of Oakville, 2009 CanLII 1650, wherein each case it was respectively said:


Definition of sidewalk – is it part of the highway?

29.  The Act does not define the term sidewalk. The Act does, however, define the boundaries of a highway at section 1(1): “highway” includes a common and public highway, street, avenue, parkway, driveway, square, place, bridge, viaduct or trestle, any part of which is intended for or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles and includes the area between the lateral property lines thereof;” (emphasis added).

30.  In my view, this wording supports a conclusion that the sidewalk is part of the highway. Firstly, the phrase “or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles” suggests that the sidewalk is included. Many people – adults and children alike – use the sidewalk when riding bicycles [which are defined at section 1(1) of the Act as a vehicle].  This is true, whether the activity is prohibited by municipal by-law or not. Second, sidewalks are generally municipal property and are therefore situated within the lateral property lines of the highway. Sidewalks are clearly distinguished from the roadway, which is the portion of the highway used primarily by motor vehicles.

31.  For example, courts have found that the definition of “highway” in the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 includes both the boulevard and the sidewalk. (see York (Regional Municipality) v DiBlasi, [2014] OJ No 2546; R v Wassilyn, [2006] OJ No 2900; and McQueen v. Niagara-on-the-Lake (Town) [1987], 9 A.C.W.S. (3d) 45)).  In DiBlasi at para. 93 the Court found, “If the reasoning of Wassilyn and McQueen is applied to the issue at hand, then a "highway" under the Act includes a sidewalk and a boulevard and must also include the ditch within its parameters.  This conclusion is bolstered bysection 44(8) of the Municipal Act, 2001 that recognizes that some parts of a "highway" are untraveled.


[10]  It is long established that municipal sidewalks are considered to be part of a highway.  See McQueen v. Niagara-on-the-Lake (Town) [1987] O.J. No. 2416 and the cases referred to therein.

Conclusion

Interpreting the term "highway" under the Municipal Act, 2001, with reference to case law decisions, elucidates that it includes boulevards, sidewalks, and ditches.  This comprehensive understanding is vital for municipalities in fulfilling their duties and managing liabilities effectively.  Strategic insights derived from legal precedents can offer valuable guidance in related areas, reinforcing the importance of informed decision-making.

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
6

NOTE: A substantial array of online searches for “lawyers in my vicinity” or “top lawyer in” frequently indicates an urgent requirement for competent legal assistance rather than a particular professional designation.  In Ontario, “licensed paralegals” are governed by the same Law Society that supervises lawyers, and they possess the authority to represent clients in specified litigation concerns.  Advocacy, legal interpretation, and procedural expertise are fundamental to that responsibility.  SFG Paralegal Services LLP provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing effective and advantageous outcomes for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: SFG Paralegal Services LLP

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with SFG Paralegal Services LLP. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.216.109
SFG Paralegal Services LLP

10265 Yonge Street, Suite 200
Richmond Hill, Ontario,
L4C 4Y7
 
P: (888) 398-0121
E: sglass@sfglegal.ca

Business Hours:

09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:

By appointment only.  Call for details.
Messages may be left anytime.

Our Experience, Your Confidence







Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A